Update: At the top. Unity; read. Now.

What we have here is quite simply a framework for law-maling by propaganda; an attempt to define the precise parameters of this offence by banging away at the public in the press with their preferred definition - which does include glorification - in the hope that when the time comes and a relevant case comes to court, jurors will have swallowed their bullshit wholesale and deliver a precedent that suits their purposes.

Bastards. PaulJ, last October:

How do you glorify terrorism?

Pretty much no change to my opinion since then either. Lords ping-pong anyone?

Technorati tags: , ,