Add to Google! Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Friend with LiveJournal

Saturday, April 8th, 2006

The POWER of party funding

08

April

Very interesting discussion over on Strange Stuff on party funding and the Power report, one I’ve been planning to write about but, as usual, not got around to finishing reading the damned report.

Essentially, I’m not sold on state funding of parties, and prefer instead a mixture of campaign spending caps and free access to more media in a less regulated manner; “party election broadcasts” are dull as ditchwater, but at least they’re equitable, let’s update and improve upon that model so that parties don’t need to spend as much on gimicky adverts, posters, etc.

Alternately, don’t give the money to parties directly, book the advertising space centrally, pay for it centrally, and share it out as per PEBs (which are determined by number of candidates fielded and thus fairly allotted to new parties as well).

If we go for state finance directly to parties (and I’d prefer we didn’t), it has to be on something similar to the POWER model, wherein we, when voting, also tick a box to allot £3 or similar to a particular party, not necessarily the one we’re voting for.

Better that than dodgy loans and party treasurers begging the rich for cash. But better to change the system such that they don’t need to send out the begging bowl, in any form.

Technorati tags: , ,


UKIP ‘parks tank’ - the world laughs.

08

April

So, they’ve made good on their promise to “park their tank on David Cameron’s abandoned lawn

Well, sort of. Guys? It’s not a tank. Even the Telegraph puts ‘tank’ in quotes. (more…)


"The penalty that good men pay for not being interested in politics is to be governed by men worse than themselves."
-PLATO (427-347BCE)
Recent Comments

Links