I am reminded that this year will mark the 300th anniversary of the Act of Union that created Great Britain. There are those that would like it to also be the last, a subject I’ve written about extensively in the past. Indeed this desire seems to be spreading both North and South of the border:
devolution was supposed to defeat nationalism. That was what George Robertson, the former chief of Nato, famously said would happen: devolution would kill nationalism ’stone dead’. Not so. For England increasingly feels the intrinsic unfairness of devolution. Now John Reid, a Scottish Home Secretary, presides over a department that has limited powers in his own constituency of Airdrie and Shotts. Soon Gordon Brown will move into 10 Downing Street, to make laws on health and education that have no play in North Queensferry, where he lives. Meanwhile, a nation ashamed of the Iraq war tries to shake off culpability by turning to the SNP.
Me? Well, I still stand by the words I wrote in my very first post at teh old site, now to be found here:
Great Britain was founded in 1707, nearly three hundred years ago. The anniversary approaches. Are we doing anything about it? Let’s be proud to be British, and remember that we are also English, Welsh, Scottish or whatever. Let us look to the future and be proud of our heritage, not look to the past and try to bolt the doors.
I’d like to celebrate the foundation of this great nation. Look to the future, a liberal, tolerant, open minded society that truly does live and let live.
Given that this useless Government appears to be doing and planning absolutely nothing, anyone got any ideas?
January 11th, 2007
Posted by
MatGB |
Britain, patriotism, Liberal Britain, England, Devolution, History |
7 comments
Would it work?:
Do you think that if we ran a publicity campaign to let people know that the left/right distinction is French, then we could rely on latent British Francophobia to finally abort the distinction?
Well, something has to. “The Lib Dems move Right”, “That’s a left-wing policy”. Um, no. It’s neither. left vs right is and ill-defined, misunderstood term that is abused by the commentariat (especially in the MSM) who show little understanding of the history.
March 7th, 2006
Posted by
MatGB |
LibDems, alignment, History |
7 comments
Nosemonkey:
The handy thing is, as there’s no accepted definition of terrorism, it would be entirely possible to argue (and a number of historians have) that the Glorious Revolution was a terrorist act. And please note the name. That’s right, “Glorious” - glorifying terror if ever I saw it.
Sounds reasonable to me. It’s not the first time we’ve discussed 1688 around here either.
February 16th, 2006
Posted by
MatGB |
NuLab, freedom, terrorism, History |
2 comments
Oh dear. The British Blogosphere’s favourite kicking ball is being even more obtuse than normal. For readers not aware, Neil Harding is a Labour supporting blogger in Brighton who has a tendency to disagree with, well, everyone, and thinks, as far as I can tell, that Tired Tony can do no wrong. His current crusade is on behalf of the (dis)Respect Agenda generally and summary confiscation as a specific. He has two posts on the subject, Why Tony is Right and Tony Blair and the respect agenda continued. The comments threads on both posts are impressively long, and, apart from Neil himself, no one has any support for his position. No, don’t worry, I’m not posting this to support him. You see, it’s so bad I thought I’d give him some more publicity.
I sometimes find in debates that the person that does the most damage to your position isn’t the person opposed to it, but the misguided supporter who, well, doesn’t quite get it and links everything together as one big overarching theme and assumes everyone opposed is inherently arguing from the same position with the same reasons.
January 13th, 2006
Posted by
MatGB |
Blair, NuLab, Constitution, freedom, History, Neil Harding, summary fines, confiscation, Authoritarian |
25 comments
I am reminded by my friend Mark, from Alderney, that today is the anniversary of his bit of the worlds invasion of our bit of the world, the Battle of Hastings. This brings to mind a little phrase that always seems to crop up when matter European are discussed, that wonderful old phrase about a thousand years of history. An example, from UKIP, here:
…the Prime Minister is signing away nothing less than Britain’s right to self-government. A thousand years of history goes down the drain…
The historian in me is always bothered by this terminology. What thousand years are you referring to, exactly?
October 14th, 2005
Posted by
MatGB |
Britain, europe, England, History |
4 comments
