Voting TaKtiX

Because democracy needs an informed electorate

Tactical Voting: Myths and reality

When you vote, do you vote Expressively, or Rationally? Most party activists and committed partizans will vote expressively, and assume that voters do likewise. However, many voters will vote rationally, seeking to maximise the impact their vote will have on the result. It is this tendency, that most activists find hard to relate to, that leads to the phenomena referred to as “tactical voting”. Still with me? Good, let me explain…

September 18th, 2006 Posted by MatGB | voting, democracy, Coalition, tactical voting, rational voting, expressive voting, Duverger | 18 comments

Predicting Scottish elections

Scottish electoral mechanics are always interesting to watch. South of the border, most seats are either safe or two-way marginals. Three-way marginals are rare, and tend to disappear over the course of a few elections, the third party squeeze / ratchet effect caused by Duverger’s Law means that it becomes “irrational” as the economists put it to vote for the third place or below candidate. Yet in Scotland? They not only still have three way marginals, they also have some 4 way marginals.

May 19th, 2006 Posted by MatGB | NuLab, voting, Parties, LibDems, electoral reform, FPTP, Duverger, Scotland, elections | 2 comments

British Politics: The Future

So, Dave wants me to join him does he? I appear to be his target audience, a sometime LibDem who believes it’s more important to defeat NuLab than to continue the old rivalries. He’s saying the right things, I remain to be convinced if he’s doing them. But, well, I’m not convinced that joining his party is for me. Scratch that, I refuse to consider it. He wants an end to petty point scoring in politics? Fine, let’s talk. Openly, honestly, and with a perspective on both history, the future and on how things work.

December 17th, 2005 Posted by MatGB | LibDems, Conservatives, electoral reform, Cameron, Coalition, philosophy, Duverger, voting systems | 3 comments